Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Get Started Today!
Texas Fertility Center Group

Then and now: are past IVF experiences associated with current preferences regarding elective single embryo transfer?


OBJECTIVE:

Previous experiences with fertility treatment and pregnancy outcomes may influence the likelihood of a patient choosing elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Our objective was to investigate whether desire to undergo eSET is associated with previous IVF experiences.

DESIGN:

Retrospective descriptive analysis of online cross-sectional survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

An anonymous survey regarding eSET preferences and experiences was distributed through social media over a five-week span in 2014. This study focused on survey participants who completed at least one IVF cycle with embryo(s) transferred or were planning to undergo IVF. Respondents self-selected into one of five mutually exclusive groups based on IVF treatment history and outcomes (see Results for description of these groups). Outcome variables included preference for single embryo transfer (defined as transferring one embryo when multiple were available) vs. multiple embryo transfer (MET), and potential likelihood of undergoing multifetal reduction if advised by a provider. Participants with a multiple birth were excluded, as eSET preference data were missing. Bivariate analyses were performed using chi-squared for comparison of proportions among groups. Significant associations (p<.05) were included in a subsequent logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS:

759 of 888 participants met inclusion criteria. Six percent were planning for an IVF cycle (Group 1), 16% were pregnant for the first time as a result of IVF (Group 2), 37% had completed at least 1 IVF cycle with no resulting births (Group 3), and 41% had at least one singleton birth and no multiple births from IVF (Group 4). Compared to Group 3 (no IVF births), participants in Group 4 (at least one singleton IVF birth) were more likely to prefer eSET (OR 1.67[1.06-2.64]). Participants in Group 1 (planning for IVF) would be more likely to consider multifetal reduction if recommended by a physician (OR 2.15 [1.09-4.25]) than those in Group 3 (no IVF births). No other inter-group differences were seen.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with at least one live birth resulting from IVF may be more likely to elect eSET, possibly reflecting the increased psychological pressure of an unsuccessful IVF cycle. Patients early in infertility treatment may be most likely to consider multifetal reduction.

Back to All Research Studies